The Fund for a Better Waterfront

September 1995

Barry Rewrites Zoning for Northern Waterfront!

On September 6, the Hoboken City Council will hold a public hearing and cast their final vote on a proposed set of amendments to the Hoboken Zoning Ordinance. An affirmative vote by the Hoboken City Council will give virtually all control over planning of the northern waterfront to the developers. These amendments will affect some 40 acres of waterfront land north of Elysian Park and east of Hudson Street, and north of 14th Street and east of Willow Avenue up to 17th.

It will allow developers, not the City, to determine street systems, traffic concerns, density of development and specific uses within the development. It will allow private enclaves with private streets, segregated from the city both physically and aesthetically. Building heights will be increased by over 50%, from 8 stories to 12 1/2 stories. Open space requirements will, in effect, be eliminated, allowing developments to be built without one single blade of grass. Many regulations and requirements concerning bars, restaurants and ferry service will be lifted.

This legislation was drafted by Joe Barry who owns about 40% of the land in this zoning district. These proposed amendments would provide Mr. Barry a tremendous wind-fall financial gain on his proposed $90 million project. In April of this year Superior Court Judge Maurice Gallipoli reversed the Hoboken Planning Board approval of Barry's Shipyard Development, calling that approval "arbitrary and capricious."

Current Zoning   Proposed Ammendments

streets
extend public
street system
private roadways
permitted

open space
30% of block 0% for PUD's

building heights
8 stories (80') 12 1/2 stories (125')

parking
enclosed, separate structures only 4 story garages at base of residential towers permitted

lot coverage
60% for principle 100% permitted buildings

conditional uses
each use considered as an individual case PUD's exempt from requirements for bars, restaurants, etc.

With these changes , the needs of the public have been replaced with the needs of the developer. There is no concern about extending the public street grid for pedestrian access and view corridors. But there is a new provision for connecting the Shipyard project to a western by-pass road. Language in the code concerning the provision of public open space, adequate recreation facilities and visual amenities is stricken. The private streets insure that the developer will have control over all access to the waterfront. Port Liberte, Roc Harbor, Independence Plaza, Riva Point, and Shelter Bay Club are but a few of the many examples of private enclave developments on the Hudson River that have denied or restricted public access by eliminating the public rights of way.

The proposed substitute for the current 30% open space requirement is a 30% "open area" provision. Rooftops, parking lots, driveways and sidewalks can satisfy this requirement. "Open area" does not, of course, conform to the state or local definition of open space, that refers to the "natural openness of the land."

Conditional Uses have unique characteristics and impact on the community in such a way as to require case by case approval and are subject to special requirements. For the I-1(W) district conditional uses include bars and restaurants. These proposed changes exempt Planned Unit Developments from such regulation.

There is no doubt that these amendments will eliminate the 48 zoning variances requested for the Shipyard Development. Allowing the Shipyard developer, Joe Barry to rewrite zoning for this district is like allowing the fox to guard the hen house. And it will allow this fox to grow very fat--at the public's expense.

 

Related Items:
   Hoboken developer Joe Barry targeted by federal investigators September 2001
   Victory for Hoboken Campaign to Stop Pier Development January 2001
   Hoboken Residents Petition City to Stop Pier Development September 2000
   Hoboken Shipyard Ups the Ante by 120 Units Over the Hudson River July 2000
   Hudson River Developers Rake In Corporate Welfare February 2000
   CBW Loses Appeal - But Five Year Court Battle Continues April 1998
   Editorial: Putting the Brakes On Over Development April 1999

Community Response:
   Please come to Tuesday's Planning Board Meeting by Carol Marsh and Augusta Przygoda
   There should be a law against residential pier development by Councilmen Dave Roberts, Ruben Ramos and Tony Soares
   Moved by presentation against pier development by Jean Forest
   We're not anti-development, but we're concerned about PIER development by Kimberly Fox
   The Shipyard pier plan is great -- for New Yorkers by Helen Hirsch
   Zoning and Planning Boards must prevent developers from blocking waterfront views by Paul J. Somerville
   More Roads are not the solution to transportion problems by Josh Tavlin
   Development numbers make me go hmmm... by F. Haas
   Take a look at Barry's motives, not those of concerned opponents by Steven Kosmacher
   Hoboken Pier Project - Part II by Joseph Barry, President, Applied Companies
   Regarding the Shipyard pier project by Joseph Barry, President, Applied Companies
   Concerned about development on pier by Nicholas A. Vitiello
   Shipyard pier project will be a great asset by Jordan Brodsky
   What has Barry done purely for charity? by Shy and out of step
   Shipyard homeowners speak out against pier construction by Dina R. Rose and Todd R. Clear
   Shipyard critics are anti-progress by Against 'The Anti-progress gang'
   Please rally 'round the piers by Janet Larson
   Save some open space; slow down development by Carol Marsh
   Now is the time to vote against congestion and building on piers by Helen Manogue, Coordinator<br>Hoboken Quality of Life Coalition
   Show up Tuesday if you don't want development on pier by John Branciforte
   Stop Private Development on the Piers by Coalition for a Better Waterfront

©1998-2000 Fund for a Better Waterfront