The Fund for a Better Waterfront

October 2003

Stevens pushes forward with plans for mega-garage on Hoboken's waterfront


 Rendering of four-story, 386-foot long garage proposed by Stevens Institute for Hoboken's waterfront.

Stevens Institute of Technology presented its plans for a massive waterfront parking garage to the Hoboken Zoning Board on Tuesday evening, October 28. Before a standing room only crowd, the Zoning Board heard two expert witnesses testify for Stevens, an architect and a landscape architect. This proposed four-story garage extends 386 feet from Fifth Street to Sixth along Sinatra Drive and 296 feet along Sixth Street. The architect testified that the garage with its staggered levels and plantings was designed to mimic the Castle Point cliffs.

The Fund for a Better Waterfront (FBW) appeared at the hearing in opposition to the garage proposal. Attorney Michael Garofalo of Laddey Clark & Ryan represented FBW and immediately questioned why this application was before the Zoning Board. Since Stevens is seeking an amendment to the site plan approval by the Hoboken Planning Board in December of 2000, the case cannot be brought before the Zoning Board, he argued.

This proposed block-long parking facility is about the same size as the mammoth parking structure built at St. Mary Hospital, taking up most of the block on Clinton Street between Third and Fourth Streets. However, the Stevens garage would face Hoboken's waterfront. And contrary to the requirements of the Zoning Code and unlike the St. Mary garage, no treatment of the facade would mimic Hoboken architecture.

To obtain approvals, Stevens must convince the Zoning Board to grant exceptions to 17 sections of the Hoboken Zoning Ordinance. They need variances for permitted use, lot coverage, building height, front yard, distance between buildings, building length, open space ratio, facade specifications, number of principal buildings per lot, conditional requirements for public parking facilities, minimum setbacks from a residential zoning district and location of garage entrance.

The difference between what Stevens wants and what is allowed is striking. The Zoning Code requires 50% of the land be open space; this proposal has 6% open space. Buildings can be only 200 feet long; this garage extends 386 feet along Sinatra Drive and 297 feet along Sixth Street. One principal building is allowed per lot; this lot already has McLean Hall and the Babbio Center (under construction). A public parking garage must be set back from residential districts by at least 100 feet; this garage is just 31 feet from the R-1 Zoning Subdistrict.

The Fund for a Better Waterfront (FBW) has been a vocal critic of various proposals put forth by Stevens Institute for the Hoboken waterfront, including the parking garage. Craig Whitaker, an urban planner and architect who developed FBW's plan for the Hoboken waterfront in 1990, described the proposed garage as "a grossly inappropriate use, which will degrade the quality of the waterfront. Stevens wants to take a premier piece of real estate and erect an exposed, oversized parking garage, blighting the only truly public waterfront along New Jersey's gold coast."

When the excavation of the garage site began in March 2002, FBW questioned the university's authority to proceed without Planning or Zoning Board approval. Then FBW's Executive Director, Ron Hine, discovered that the serpentine rock being blasted and carted away contained asbestos. Hine and FBW President Aaron Lewit filed a complaint with the Hoboken Board of Health and objected to the lack of precautions being taken at the work site. In its current application, Stevens proposes to remove an additional 12,000 cubic yards of material that includes the serpentine rock.

On January 13, 2003, Stevens Institute filed a lawsuit against FBW, Hine and Lewit charging them with defamation for statements made regarding the asbestos. Attorneys representing these defendants say that none of the statements were defamatory and the true purpose of the lawsuit is to silence an organization that has been critical of Stevens' development plans. This case is currently before Judge Camille Kenny of Superior Court in Hudson County.

The portion of the garage that has been built sits directly beneath the Babbio Center which is currently under construction. No further construction of the garage will be permitted without Board approval. Two of Stevens Institute's other waterfront proposals have failed to materialize. The university proposed an extensive development project for the site of the former Maxwell House Coffee plant, land that it did not own or control. About a year ago, Stevens' scheme for this property fell apart. More recently, it has been reported that Stevens Institute's 2-year old proposal to build an athletic facility over the Hudson River at the Union Dry Dock site has also failed to get off the ground.

The next Zoning Board hearing is scheduled for Tuesday evening, November 18th at 8 p.m. Stevens has an additional four witnesses to present, a representative from Stevens, an engineer, a traffic engineer and an urban planner.

 

Related Items:
   Stevens Offers Resolution to Parking Garage Saga November 2007
   Appellate Court negates bulk of Stevens' suit against FBW. FBW appealing to NJ Supreme Court asking for sanctions against Stevens. July 2007
   Appellate Court judges who ruled on a landmark zoning case hear oral arguments in FBW vs. Hoboken Zoning Board March 2006
   Court throws out final count of Stevens' case against FBW. 1st Amendment right to engage in public debate preserved. February 15 2005
   FBW files suit in Court claiming de facto rezoning by Hoboken Zoning Board for Stevens garage October 2004
   Court throws out defamation claim in Stevens Institute's lawsuit against FBW July 2004
   Judge Camille Kenny considers the evidence in Stevens Institute v. FBW July 2004
   Geologist testifies that drilling and blasting of serpentine rock at Stevens created public health peril February 2004
   Garage hearings tainted due to Stevens hiring brother of Zoning Board Chair February 2004
   Roof garden withers at first hearing for 725-car waterfront garage January 2004
   Stevens Institute attempts to silence FBW through frivolous defamation lawsuit February 20 2003
   Waterfront group supports stop-work order February 15, 2003
   Stevens' campus master plan has new firm advocating same old projects January 2003
   Stevens seeking Planning Board approval for parking garage under construction for past six months September 2002
   Was illegal permit granted to Stevens Institute for parking garage? City of Hoboken to decide July 2002
   Stevens' proposals negate Hoboken's opportunity for continuous waterfront park March 2002

Community Response:
   Zoning Board didn't 'ask the right questions' by Hank Forrest
   Relentless overdevelopment continues by Greg Ribot
   Stevens skips chance to make case for garage by Helen Manogue, Doris China, Alice Crozier, Ken Geraghty, Paul Neshamkin, and Bill Tobias
   Don't let Stevens reverse progress on our waterfront by Ron Hine, Fund for a Better Waterfront
   Stevens and Hoboken by Elizabeth Glatt
   Re: Stevens and the garage by Hank Forrest
   Stevens' 'arrogance' caused quite a stir at Planning Board meeting by Ron Hine
   New parking garage or destruction to view of waterfront by Aaron Lewit
   I recognize a good project when I see it by Ricky Mason
   The Fall from Grace by Peter Rozano
   Consider Stevens waterfront plan carefully by Ann Wallace
   It simply feels right by Tom Schwartz
   Something stinks, and it's not the Hudson at low tide by Steve Trevisan
   This responsible development is just what Hoboken needs by Diane Daley
   Stevens plan may block waterfront community by Jason Burch
   A clearer picture by Randy Brummette

©1998-2000 Fund for a Better Waterfront